Skip to main content

In "Games at Twilight" by Anita Desai, how does the suspenseful moment help to build your interest in the conflict?

I believe "the suspenseful moment" that the question is referring to is meant to indicate the time that Ravi spends hiding from Raghu in the shed.  You are correct; it is a very suspenseful sequence.  Lots of writers include suspenseful moments.  Oftentimes, those moments are life-threatening experiences for the characters.  Desai's story does not use that kind of suspense.  Ravi is not in a life-threatening or dangerous situation, yet the hiding scene is very suspenseful, and it really draws readers into the conflict.  


The reader is held in suspense and is very interested in the conflict because the conflict is so familiar to readers.  We've all been kids before.  We've all played hide-and-seek.  We all know what the desire to win feels like.  Desai has provided readers with a situation that we are intimately familiar with.  When I play hide-and-seek with my own little kids, I can see the suspense on their faces when I come looking for them (and conveniently don't see them).  Seeing my kids makes me remember those feelings from when I was a kid.  Desai's story does that too.  Readers practically read that section of the story while holding their breath, because we don't want to signal Raghu any more than Ravi does.  


From there, Desai continues to build the suspense by describing the dark, spooky hiding place that Ravi has chosen.  It's dark, unfamiliar, and loaded with creepy organisms.  



But the shed smelled of rats, anthills, dust, and spider webs.



Most people have experienced being in a place like that before, and most people don't like the feeling.  So again, the story keeps the interest of readers by continuing to be familiar.  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more