Skip to main content

What were the consequences of city growth in the 1800s?

There were many consequences as cities grew rapidly in the 1800s. Cities grew for several reasons. Immigrants were coming to the United States, and they settled in the cities. Also, people were moving to the cities from the rural areas in search of jobs and in search of an opportunity to do more things that weren’t available in the rural areas.


As the population of the cities increased, problems arose. There was an increase in both crime and pollution. Many factories were located in the cities. This contributed to the pollution. Cities struggled with the disposal of trash because of the increased population. With low paying jobs, there was a lot of poverty. This led to an increase in crime.


Other issues existed. Housing was in short supply. Many people lived in tenements, which were overcrowded apartments. Kids weren’t attending school. As a result, they often got into trouble. Political machines formed to help the poor people. The political machines were corrupt, yet they eventually controlled city politics because they had the support of the people whose needs they were meeting.


There were many issues that arose as cities grew in the 1800s.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more