Skip to main content

Based on their actions in North America, why were Dutch respectful of other cultures?

The Dutch prided themselves in a society of openness.  They usually supported freedom of religion.  They also lived peacefully among those who were different.


When the Dutch established New Netherland in North America, they carried on this culture of acceptance.  The Union of Utrecht provided for freedom of religion, and the laws of this document were followed in New Netherland. 


The purpose of setting up the Dutch colony was a financial one and not one related to Christian evangelism.  This led to a colony that was more secular than other nearby ones.  Jews settled in New Netherland.  The diversity of New Netherland can also be revealed through the languages spoken there.  Over a dozen different languages were spoken in New Netherland.  Many people who were not Dutch settled there peacefully.  Most of the governing bodies in New Netherland allowed others to live there despite cultural differences.  It was a place of overall acceptance.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.