Skip to main content

In the book Woodsong, how do the dogs react when Paulsen gets injured?

In the book, Paulsen tears his kneecap before his sled shoots off the edge of a frozen waterfall. To make matters worse, Paulsen then drops twenty feet and lands on his injured knee on a frozen pond, just beneath the waterfall.


After a brief loss of consciousness, Paulsen begins to realize his grave danger. He is bleeding profusely and is unable to get to his feet. By his calculations, he is at least twenty miles from home and about eight or nine miles from the closest human dwelling. Paulsen is frightened and worries that he will die out in the cold. As he contemplates his fate, he notices Obeah, one of his dogs, looking down at him from the top of the waterfall.


Usually, sled dogs do not go back for their masters or mushers, but Obeah drags the other dogs down an embankment until they reach Paulsen. The dogs bring Paulsen's sled to him, while another dog, Duberry, begins to lick and clean the wounds on Paulsen's leg. Because of his dogs, our protagonist is able to muster up the last of his energy to get himself onto the sled. Once on the sled, he ties his leg down, and the dogs proceed to pull him home.


When Paulsen gets injured, the dogs do not abandon him; instead, they come to his rescue, offer him comfort, and patiently lead him to safety.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.