Skip to main content

Why is Brian traveling in a bushplane in Gary Paulsen's Hatchet?

In the opening chapter of Gary Paulsen's Hatchet, we learn that Brian is traveling in a Cessna 406, a type of bushplane, also spelled bush plane, to Canada to visit his father for the summer.

Bush planes are private planes used to transport passengers and cargo to remote, rugged areas such as to the wilderness areas of Canada, Alaska, Africa, or Australia. They are great for landing on rugged terrain because they are designed for durability, to be able to land without long runways, and to be able to land on snow or water.

Brian is traveling to Canada because his parents have recently divorced, and the judge has granted Brian's father "visitation rights" during the summers, whereas Brian would be staying with his mother during the school years. Brian was specifically heading to Canada because his father worked in the oil fields of Canada, having just developed a new drill bit:



His father was a mechanical engineer who had designed or invented a new drill bit for oil drilling, a self-cleaning, self-sharpening bit. He was working in the oil fields of Canada, up on the tree line where the tundra started and the forests ended. (Ch. 1)



It is Brian's first time flying in any sort of plane, ever, and, unfortunately, his first flight does not turn out very well. The pilot has a major heart attack, drying and crashing the plane, leaving Brian stranded in the wilderness by a lake, far away from his destination. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.