Skip to main content

What qualifications did Macbeth possess to become a good king? In other words, how or why was Macbeth was next in line for the throne? Malcolm and...

This is a good question, as it deals with a potentially tricky part of the text. While it's true that Macbeth isn't directly related to King Duncan and so seems an unlikely pick for the throne, it's important to remember that Macbeth was wildly popular with the king at the time and had proved himself recently on the battlefield. 


The play opens at the tail end of a battle between King Duncan's forces and Macdonwald. During the course of the fighting, Macbeth distinguishes himself by defeating Macdonwald and showing great courage, and King Duncan is so impressed that he names Macbeth Thane of Cawdor. This unexpected promotion signals Macbeth's growing popularity with the monarch, and it is this growing political clout that allows Macbeth to jockey himself into consideration for the crown. As such, while Macbeth does not have a claim to kingship via relation to the king, he has won the king's favor and proven himself to be a capable leader, at least in military terms. In that case, the other Scottish lords deem him to be a worthy substitution, and so he is chosen more or less by popular demand in the absence of Duncan's sons. 


Also, it's worth mentioning that Duncan's sons flee because they think that they might also be in danger of losing their lives. This act causes the Scottish lords to consider Duncan's sons to be the murderers, further motivating the aristocracy to choose Macbeth in their place. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.