Skip to main content

Many biochemical processes influence the complexity and structural organization of an organism. Explain why it doesn't go against the first and...

The first law of thermodynamics states that matter can be neither created nor destroyed. It is only converted from one form of energy into another. This energy conversion isn’t 100 percent efficient. Some of it is converted into an unusable form. This creates entropy, which is a measure of disorder. The second law of thermodynamics states that with each energy conversion, entropy increases.


Living things are considered highly ordered with low entropy. To remain this way, energy must be expended. Over time, the biological processes that maintain this order become less and less efficient. This causes an increase in entropy. Eventually, the process will become so inefficient that an organism dies.


The first law is demonstrated through the biological processes themselves. The energy needed to maintain this order is derived from energy conversions. Examples of this are photosynthesis, aerobic respiration, and anaerobic respiration. Photosynthesis converts light energy into chemical energy. Both forms of respiration convert chemical energy into ATP molecules, which is the currency of important biochemical reactions such as DNA synthesis.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more