Skip to main content

Which instrument or method can be used to find the volume of a marble ?

Q: 


Which instrument or method can be used to find the volume of a marble?


A:


Perhaps the easiest way to find the volume of a marble is through Archimedes's principle. This is a principle of the displacement of water that is named after the Greek mathematician Archimedes. This principle states that when an object is fully submerged in water, the volume of water displaced (moved) by the object will be equal to the volume of the object. 


The instrument needed is a graduated cylinder. This is a (usually glass) container that indicates volumes, usually in milliliters (mL).


In real terms, this means that when an object is placed into water and fully submerged (covered), the water level will rise by an amount that is equivalent to the volume (size) of the object. The method goes as follows:


Measure out an amount of water into a graduated cylinder large enough to fit the marble. Note the volume of water indicated on the graduated cylinder and write it down. Next, place the marble gently into the water. The water level will rise due to displacement. Note the new level of the water. Subtract the two water levels (the new, higher level minus the previous one). This is equal to the volume of the marble in milliliters. 1 milliliter is equivalent to 1 cubic centimeter. Suppose we started with 2 milliliters of water and the water rose to 2.5 milliliters after dropping the marble into the water. The marble's volume would be equal to .5 mL or `.5 cm ^3` .``

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.