Skip to main content

Describe the character of the Postmaster in Tagore's "The Postmaster?"

In Tagore's short story, the postmaster is very concerned with his own welfare.


The postmaster has been relocated from Calcutta to the small village of Ulapur.  From the start of the narrative, he is restless.  His interactions with Ratan, a village orphan, interrupt his boredom.  Even though he converses with her, he seems to do so to occupy his time.  He teaches her how to read, more as a way to occupy time at a place where he "had nothing to do."  The postmaster fails to understand the emotional connection Ratan develops to him, something that is tightened when she nurses him back to health when he becomes ill due to the rains.


In the meantime, the postmaster's thoughts focus on leaving.  When his leave is granted, he joyfully tells Ratan of his plans.  She asks if she could go with him, and while he does not directly say so, it is clear that he considers it an "absurd idea." As he leaves, the postmaster feels some misgivings about abandoning Ratan. However, he ends up rationalizing these feelings away with "philosophical reflections" about how people are in a state of constant passing.


In terms of his character, the postmaster does not see past his own reality. While he can be seen as self-indulgent, I think that Tagore creates a character who is focused on his own needs.  This is why he cannot understand Ratan's request to go with him.  We get the impression that the postmaster will find success because he will always take care of his needs before anything else. In this way, he is different from Ratan, who wanders around the village in search for her "Dada."  Tagore's postmaster would never experience such hurt or yearning because of his self-interested character.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more