Skip to main content

In The Catcher in the Rye, are there are a lot of details without unifying and general ideas? Does this weaken the novel? Does it seem to teach a...

The Catcher in the Rye seems — and is — episodic. Author J.D. Salinger seems to have been worried about that himself. The Catcher in the Rye does not seem to have a lot of unconnected or meaningless details, though. What holds the novel together is that Holden, the protagonist, is searching for something. He keeps going from place to place in Manhattan looking for whatever it is he is searching for. He appears to be very lonely, and he must be searching for something like companionship, friendship, love, or some other kind of relief from his loneliness. Countless young people love this novel because they feel the same way. For many, that feeling of existential angst is like a prelude to adulthood with marriage and family.


A novel is a work of art. A work of art does not have to teach a lesson. It is intended to communicate a feeling, or feelings. The Catcher in the Rye does not seem to teach a lesson. I believe it is a mistake to look for "lessons" in short stories and novels. The writer is typically trying to relieve himself of feelings by communicating them to others.


Although The Catcher in the Rye is episodic, it is like a big impressionistic mural of Manhattan. The pictures are all held together by the fact that they are all in the mind of a single individual, Holden Caulfield. I do not believe there are a lot of details without unifying and general ideas. Therefore, I do not feel the novel is weakened. In almost every episode, Holden is looking for human contact. He is usually disappointed. When Holden is in contact with Sunny and Maurice, he is extremely disappointed, but that episode seems illustrative of most of the others in the book. There used to be a saying among New Yorkers which went something like this:



"You want friendship? Buy a dog!"



It is ironic that Holden is staying in Manhattan, the largest city in America and one of the largest in the world, but can't find human companionship. There is an old Latin saying that describes this phenomenon:



Magna civitas, magna solitudo.



This has been translated in various ways. One is: A great city is a great desert. Another is: The bigger the city, the greater the loneliness. Salinger's technique is a way of trying to capture a whole dizzying, dazzling city in one mural or montage. There are few novels that present so many characters so incisively. The novel was first published in 1951. If it were "weak" or only "entertainment," it could not have lasted so long or have meant so much to so many people.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more