Skip to main content

The specific heat of ice is 0.492 cal/(g × °C). How many calories of heat are required to raise 100.0 g of ice from -20.0 °C to -0.5 °C?

Hello!


The specific heat is, by the definition, the quantity of heat that is required to raise the temperature of a mass unit of a substance by one degree. One may use any units of heat (energy), mass and temperature, but the numerical value of the specific heat will depend on this choice.


The specific heat is a characteristics of a substance itself, it does not depend on the mass of a body and the change of the temperature. But it is important that the state of aggregation remains the same.


In our case, the given temperatures are inside the interval where ice remains solid. Therefore the amount of heat is  `C*m*Delta t = 0.492*100*(-0.5-(-20)) approx 959.4` (calories). This is the answer. Note that the all data are given in the suitable units (degrees, grams, calories).

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more