Skip to main content

Why did Karait get killed by Rikki-tikki?

Rikki-tikki killed Karait because Karait threatened to harm Teddy.  


The fight between Karait and Rikki-tikki is very brief, and the build-up to it is even more brief. The text says Rikki-tikki was ready to be petted. Teddy is only too happy to oblige, and right when Teddy bends down, Karait announces his presence: "Be careful. I am Death!"


Karait is a "brown snakeling," meaning he is a young brown snake. There are two main types of brown snakes. The North American brown snake is harmless. Karait is not this kind of snake, because the text says his bite is as deadly as a cobra's bite. That means Karait is likely an Eastern brown snake. According to various sources, the Eastern brown snake is the second most toxic land snake in the world. That ranking puts Karait's venom as more powerful than Nag and Nagaina's venom. Karait is dangerous and threatening to Teddy. Rikki-tikki is a mongoose, and killing snakes is what he does. Add to that the credible threat that Karait is to Teddy. Rikki-tikki's instinct is to kill the snake and protect Teddy.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.