Skip to main content

What is the purpose of each of George’s handicaps in "Harrison Bergeron"?

George Bergeron's handicaps are meant to reduce him to the level of an average person so that he will be equal to all others in his society.


The society of 2081 has managed to make "everybody...finally equal." Hazel, the wife of George Bergeron, is perfectly average, so she wears no handicaps. However, her husband George is highly intelligent and physically strong; therefore, he is required to wear various handicaps.


  • Mental-handicap radio - George must wear this radio in his ear. At intervals of twenty seconds, a transmitter sends a sharp noise that prevents him from having an unfair mental advantage. Some of the noises that are sent through George's mind are so strong that he is physically stunned. Whenever he has a thought, a sharp noise occurs or sirens sound so that he will not finish a thought or remember what it is.

  • Handicap bag - George wears a canvas bag that contains forty-seven pounds of birdshot. This bag is padlocked around his neck. If he tampers with this handicap, George can be sentenced to two years in prison and a thousand dollar fine for every lead ball he removes.

When George's bag becomes too heavy for him, his wife Hazel tells him to lie on the couch for a while:



"Go on and rest the bag for a little while....I don't care if you're not equal to me for a while."



But George is so indoctrinated that he tells his wife that if he lightens his load, then other people might do the same, and before too long, they would all be in the dark ages again in which inequality existed.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.