Skip to main content

Out of all the leaders of the civil rights movement why is Martin Luther King the only one with a national holiday?

It appears from the history of the attempts to introduce his birthday as a national holiday that it is extraordinary that we have any African-American at all honored this way.  The first attempts began shortly after King's assassination in 1968, but Congress did not pass a bill for this holiday until 1983, to be effective in 1986.  The argument stated was that the cost would be a burden to the taxpayers, since national holidays were paid days off for federal employees.  One has to wonder, though, whether this argument would have been made for someone who was not African-American. 


There were no doubt many other important civil rights figures. Rosa Parks would have made a good pick, since we have no women honored this way.  But I do think the two factors that led to King as the choice were his outsize contributions to the movement and his martyrdom.  Most people, if asked to name leaders of the civil rights movement are likely to have a difficult time thinking beyond King.  And his horrific assassination was his ultimate sacrifice to the movement, a sacrifice he certainly knew was possible and perhaps even likely. 


It is clear from just following the daily news that we are not in a post-racial world yet, any more than we are in a post-sexist one.  So, I think we have to count ourselves lucky to have one African-American honored with a national holiday, and King, with all that he did accomplish and his sacrifice of his life, seems to me to be a very good choice. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.