Skip to main content

In the short story "Thank You, Ma'm," why did Mrs. Jones have Roger wash his face?

Although Langston Hughes does not explicitly tell us why Mrs. Jones makes Roger wash his face in “Thank you, Ma’m,” we can certainly infer the reason from the story.  We can infer that Mrs. Jones makes Roger wash his face in order to help instill in him a sense of pride and self-worth.


In this story, Mrs. Jones is clearly trying to reform Roger by making him respect himself.  After she initially kicks and shakes him, she stops trying to punish him much and instead tries to rehabilitate him.  When she takes him home, she repeatedly leaves him alone in such a way that he could both take her money and escape.  She is clearly trying to make him feel better about himself so that he will stop trying to commit crimes.


Once we understand this, we can see why Mrs. Jones has Roger wash his face.  His dirty face is a symbol of his life in general.  It shows that he does not respect himself enough to keep clean and it shows that his upbringing has been poor because he has no one at home to teach him to keep clean.  Mrs. Jones wants to reverse this situation.  She wants him to clean his face (and comb his hair) so that he will be presentable and look like someone who can be respected.  If he does this, perhaps he can learn to respect himself as well.


In this story, Roger’s face symbolizes the state of his life and his self-respect.  Mrs. Jones wants him to wash it as a first step to regaining his sense of self-worth so that he can stay out of trouble.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.