Skip to main content

What incentives does a company have to deliver high quality services or products?

There are three primary motivations for developing a business model that includes the delivery of high quality goods and services: market reputation, customer loyalty and retention, and customer satisfaction. These three benefits can contribute to a business model that is both sustainable and profitable.

Customer Satisfaction
A customer who is satisfied is beneficial in that the satisfied customer is unlikely to seek to return the product or receive a refund for unsatisfactory services. The customer then keeps the product and does not burden the company with customer service costs and in many cases inventory loss. Customer satisfaction is the starting point before the benefits of market reputation and customer loyalty/retention occur. If a customer is unsatisfied, the following two benefits will not occur.




Customer Retention and Loyalty
Customers who receive high quality products and services from a company are more likely to stay with or revisit that company. By providing excellent products, a company can ensure that when a customer has need of their product or services again, the customer will return to them and not a competitor. Low quality products, and even mid-quality products, are unlikely to encourage customer loyalty, as these options are often widely available from a variety of competing businesses. 




Market Reputation
With a continued history of delivering an excellent product, a company develops a reputation for excellence. That reputation translates into value because that company can comfortably maintain a price point that reflects the quality of the product or service. Additional value is added with the attraction of new customers. New customers can confidently interact with the business as a result of the reputation that precedes it. With a strong reputation for quality, a new customer can expect that the products will be good. In a time when customer reviews are widely available on the internet, reputation is increasingly important, as many new customers will not approach a company if it has a reputation for poor quality.




Ultimately, the goal of a business is to generate revenue. These three benefits of a quality-centric organizational model, when wielded prudently, can lead to profit and stability within a business.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.