Skip to main content

How did the Cold War operate?

The Cold War was a period of competitions and confrontations between the United States and the Soviet Union. It began after World War II ended and lasted until 1991.


The Soviet Union and the United States had confrontations over the spread of communism. The Soviet Union had spread communism to Eastern Europe and wanted to spread it to Western Europe and to Asia after World War II ended. We took actions to prevent this. We offered economic aid to countries trying to prevent communism from spreading. We also helped countries militarily. We helped West Berlin stay noncommunist with the Berlin Airlift. We went to the United Nations to help South Korea fight the invasion from North Korea. We strongly confronted the Soviet Union when they built missile sites and put missiles in Cuba.


We also competed with the Soviet Union in other areas. One of those areas was in space exploration. Both countries wanted to be the first to launch a satellite and to be the first to get an astronaut in orbit around the earth. The Soviet Union did these things before we did. These countries also competed to be the first to get an astronaut on the moon. We accomplished that feat before the Soviet Union did.


We also competed in sports. The Olympic games were a chance for each country to show off its athletes. Medal counts were very important.


The Cold War was a series of confrontations and competitions in many areas between the United States and the Soviet Union.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.