Skip to main content

What are some allusions in The Great Gatsby and where are they found (page numbers)?

When Nick attends his first party at Gatsby's, he and Jordan go into the library and meet a drunk man wearing round glasses who is inspecting the books.  The man is amazed that the books on the shelves are real, and he refers to Gatsby as "a regular Belasco" (45). David Belasco was a theater producer, director, and playwright who lived from 1853 to 1931; thus, he would have been alive when the text was written and set. In making such a comparison, the owl-eyed man implies that Gatsby is good at building a realistic set or stage; he's adept at creating believable facades.


Gatsby later introduces Nick to a gambler named "Mr. [Meyer] Wolfsheim" who takes credit for having fixed the 1919 World's Series (69, 73).  This character was inspired by, and thus alludes to, Arnold Rothstein, a real-life racketeer who did, indeed, help to fix the World's Series in 1919. That Gatsby hangs out with this kind of person should give readers -- and Nick -- some insight into the kind of business dealings he has. They are shady at best; illegal and immoral at worst.


After Gatsby and Daisy finally reunite and she dislikes the one party she attends, Nick says that the parties at Gatsby's stop altogether and that Gatsby's "career as Trimalchio was over" (113).  Trimalchio is a character from a Roman novel, The Satyricon, about a man who works hard and perseveres, and so attains wealth and power. He throws opulent dinner parties where servants bring dish after dish of rich and exotic foods. Nick thus compares Gatsby to a hard worker and party-thrower, as these things seem to comprise the majority of his identity, until Daisy returns to his life.


(**All page numbers are taken from the Scribner's, New York, edition of the text.)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...