Skip to main content

Why do historians refer to the period between World War I and World War II as the "Age of Anxiety?"

Paul Tillich, a theologian, coined the term "Age of Anxiety" in the mid 20th century to refer to the sense of meaninglessness, particularly in Europe, that developed after World War I. This war, fought between great empires such as the Austro-Hungarian Empire, Czarist Russia, and Imperial Germany (among others), saw these empires crumble by the war's end. In addition, the types of destruction unleashed by the war were new, such as the use of poison gas, and these weapons and violence also targeted civilians. After the war, people were faced with the destructive results of the war and with the political aftermath of the war. Germany had to pay large reparations that hobbled its economy and helped pave for the unfortunate rise of Hitler and the Nazis, and Russia embarked on a Bolshevik Revolution and Civil War. 


Some of the sense of anxiety in the inter-war period arose from Europe's instability after World War I, when so many old Empires were broken up without stable new systems in their place. In addition, on a philosophical level, people were faced with new forms of modernity, such as the changing role of women and the sense of meaningless that resulted from the war, that left them feeling uneasy. While the old forms of government and society had been broken down, the new forms were too new to be stable and accepted. After the Great Depression started in 1929, people were further destabilized, leading to the rise of Fascism and to the beginnings of World War II. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.