Skip to main content

What idea does Tim O'Brien develop in "On the Rainy River"?

The primary idea that O'Brien presents is the notion and the nature of shame, guilt, and responsibility. In 1968, the main character in this story, Tim O'Brien, (intentionally the same as the author, although it's not autobiographical), has been drafted into the Army, and he struggles to decide whether he should serve in Vietnam or flee to Canada. 


In the chapter, O'Brien describes himself as "politically naive," yet he knows a great deal more about the history and background of Vietnam than the ignorant and jingoistic "polyestered Kiwanis boys... and the fine upstanding gentry out at the country club" do.  O'Brien feels the guilt that would accompany his desertion, envisioning "[his] father's eyes" if he told him he was running, yet he justifiably sees himself as being "too good for this war."


O'Brien does run for a while. Holed up at Elroy Berdahl's fishing camp on the Rainy River that divides the U.S. and Canada, O'Brien spends a tortuous week on the horns of his dilemma. Berdahl refrains from commenting or advising him, even though he obviously knows why O'Brien is there. They coexist in a "ferocious silence," as O'Brien agonizes over what to do.  Ultimately, Berdahl takes him out in his boat, positioning it "twenty yards" from Canada, where O'Brien can clearly see the shore. It's a powerful and symbolic setting, and it is there that O'Brien ultimately decides to submit, to be a "coward" and not "swim away from [his] hometown and [his] country and [his] life," and instead to go to war, simply because "[he] was embarrassed not to."


Here lies the central question of the story: Which is more courageous—to go fight in a war you don't believe in and possibly die, or to follow your own convictions in the face of humiliation and exile? 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more