Skip to main content

Why were the Kennedy-Nixon debates so significant?

The Kennedy-Nixon debates were very significant. Up until this time, there had never been a presidential debate on live television. For the first time, people were able to see the faces, reactions, appearances, and mannerisms of the candidates, as well as hearing their answers to the questions that they were asked.


In the first debate, when people saw John F. Kennedy, they saw a young, energetic man who was dressed very well. When they saw Richard Nixon, they saw a man who appeared to need a shave and who looked tired. His pale suit faded into the background. John Kennedy looked directly into the camera when answering questions, giving the public the belief that he was talking directly to them. Richard Nixon looked away from the camera as if he was talking directly to John Kennedy. The public felt he wasn’t speaking to them. This first debate influenced some voters to support John Kennedy. While Nixon did better in the other debates, some people made up their mind based on the first debate. When people were asked who won this first debate, those who only heard it on the radio said that Nixon had won. Those who saw it on television said that Kennedy had won. Since the election was very close, it is possible to say that the debates helped John Kennedy win the election.


The debates were also important because it signaled the importance of television when people are running for office. Debates are now common for many elected offices, not just for the presidency. Television is also used to spread a candidate’s message and to attack a candidate’s opponent. These debates showed how important image and style were for candidates running for office. The substance of what a candidate had to say or what the candidate believed was no longer enough. If a candidate lacks style and doesn’t project a positive image, the candidate will have a harder time winning an election based on substance alone.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

etymology - Origin of the greeting "Sweet dreams".

Does anybody know the etymology of the phrase "sweet dreams"? I tried googling but did not find anything satisfying. Is this a relatively new phrase of the modern world or has this been in use for some time? I think it's the latter one. Answer The OED has the interjection as "a farewell to someone going to bed" from the 20th century: 1908 Sears Roebuck Catal. 198/1 Tenor Solos..Good Bye, Sweet Dreams, Good Bye. But it goes back until at least the 19th and possibly 18th centuries. John Wolcot, writing under the pseudonym of Peter Pindar, used it in his poem "Orson and Ellen; A Legendary Tale" published in 1801: Also from 1801 in The infernal Quixote (Page 287) by Charles Lucas: In the March 1776 of The Universal Magazine was published "The Serenade. A Pastoral Tale. From the German of Gesner" , where the shepherd Daphnis watches over his beloved as she sleeps and sings: The same tale appears in 1776's as Idyl XI, " Daphnis ...

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

What are the similarities between the relationships of the characters in The Outsiders and Romeo and Juliet?

At first glance, it might appear as if the characters in  The Outsiders  by S. E. Hinton and  Romeo and Juliet  by William Shakespeare do not have much in common; however, when one isolates the core of the conflicts, it becomes clear that the relationships in both stories are rooted in rivalry and secrecy.  In both  The Outsiders  and  Romeo and Juliet , an overarching theme is rivalry. While   socioeconomic status separates the greasers from the Socs in The Outsiders , last names separates the Montagues from the Capulets, who appear to be relatively equal in terms of socioeconomic status. Due to these rivalries, there are instances of deadly interactions in both stories. In  The Outsiders , Johnny kills Bob (whether his actions were justified or not is debatable). In  Romeo and Juliet , Romeo kills Tybalt and Paris, and Tybalt kills Mercutio. These deaths have profound effects on the main characters. In Ponyboy's case, the Johnny's death and other events in the novel inspire h...