Skip to main content

What are some aspects/themes in Macbeth that are still relevant today, and how so?

Since Shakespeare "invented the human as we know it," as Shakespearean expert Harold Bloom writes, there are themes and motifs in Macbeth such as "vaulting ambition," excessive power, subterfuge, and paranoia, that are truly relevant in modern politics.


One of the popular television series this and previous years has been House of Cards, a realistic program set in Washington, D.C. whose scripts deal primarily with themes from Macbeth that are relevant today: "ruthless pragmatism, manipulation, and power." These themes are also much in line with a note left by Vince Foster, White House aide for the Clinton Administration, whose dead body was found in a park in Washington, D.C. It read, "Here, ruining people is considered sport."


Certainly, President Richard M. Nixon, who was given the moniker "King Richard," was a man seized with "vaulting ambition" and a desire for power as well as a paranoia to outmatch that of Macbeth. His infamous wiretapping of Democratic headquarters at the Watergate Hotel was illustrative of both his ambition and his paranoia, borne not from prophesies, but from past experiences of political losses--his moving Birnam Woods. (He had thought that John F. Kennedy stole the 1960 presidential election from him because he was ahead in all the polls before the television debates.) That he abused his power is exemplified in his invocation of "executive privilege" to protect members of the White House. This privilege allowed members of the executive branch to resist interference from the legislative and judicial branches. With this political manipulation, Nixon kept Congress out of White House personnel records.  


Even with the current administration in the U.S. there are those who have voiced concerns over executive orders and other privileges taken that have by-passed the legislative branch as well as the Constitution. These actions have, certainly, been perceived by some in both Washington and the private sector as overly ambitious and excessive.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...