Jack is never elected chief. At the beginning of the novel, the boys decide to elect Ralph because he is holding the conch. As the novel progresses, Ralph proves to be an ineffective leader and the boys gradually begin to favor Jack. Jack proves to be a fearless hunter and natural leader. Although Jack's initial attempt to usurp power fails, the majority of the boys decide to join his tribe. The boys enjoy Jack's tribe because he takes them hunting, provides them with meat, and allows them to play. Unlike Ralph, Jack appeals to the boys' primitive instincts. Eventually, Jack turns out to be a tyrannical ruler who uses fear and punishment to control his band of savages. Although Jack is never technically elected chief, he ends up gaining power by appealing to the boys' savage nature and claiming that Ralph is an effective leader.
As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Comments
Post a Comment