Skip to main content

Based on the Preface, Introduction, and Chapters 1-4 of Ian Haney López's Dog Whistle Politics: How Coded Racial Appeals Have Reinvented...

George Wallace changed his political strategy of the 1950's after losing the race for governor. At that time he was considered a racial moderate, who, if anything, leaned toward the liberal side. But, after his opponent defeated him, Wallace realized that he had been defeated because of underlying racial preferences that his opponent supported.


After his defeat in 1958 for the position of Governor of Alabama, Wallace sat for a long time in his car, chewing his cigar and pondering his loss. He had been supported by the NAACP while his opponent was backed by the KKK. But, the 1954 Supreme Court decision of Brown v. Board of Education, which ruled that segregated schools were unconstitutional, caused many of the citizens of Alabama, who perceived Wallace to be soft on the race issue, to vote against him. Realizing the reason for his defeat, Wallace vowed that no one "will ever out-n****r me again." So, four years later, he ran as a racial reactionary in the gubernatorial race. With this persona, then, Governor Wallace stood in the doorway of the University of Alabama as he declared, "Segregation now, segregation forever!" even though he knew he would allow the African-American students to enter the university two hours later. He was simply using "dog whistle politics." For, hundreds of letters flooded the governor's office, applauding his actions. Ninety-five per cent of these letters praised Wallace's stand.


After receiving these letters from all over the country, Wallace realized that he had tapped into a fear that was spread throughout the nation. So, in his presidential run in 1968 as a candidate for the American Independent Party, Wallace appealed to blue-collar workers and those who were anti-federal government control and more for "states' rights." Also, he offered generous increases for beneficiaries of Social Security and Medicare, and he declared that if the Vietnam Conflict were not winnable in 90 days, it would be ended.


In 1972 as he ran for president, Wallace was more radical and more explicit about his opposition to his opponents as he declared, "There's not a dime's worth of difference between the Republicans and Democrats," implying that both wanted to radically desegregate the South (dog whistle politics). Wallace received more support from extremist groups during this campaign.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more