Skip to main content

Chapter 4 onwards serves as a turning point in The Great Gatsby. Why did Nick Carraway choose this point?

To say that Chapter 4 represents a turning point in the novel means that it marks some significant change in the plot or narrative. Nick begins this chapter by listing the usual guests at Gatsby's parties, and Gatsby and Nick spend some time alone together. Gatsby tells his ludicrously romantic story, which Nick can scarcely believe until Gatsby produces apparent evidence of this history: a photograph. Nick and Gatsby go into the city, and Gatsby introduces Nick to Meyer Wolfsheim. Later, Jordan explains the history between Gatsby and Daisy and how Daisy ended up marrying Tom Buchanan. 


This chapter, then, really initiates the present story line between Gatsby and Daisy and sets into motion all the events which follow.  The chapter also begins to confirm some of our—and Nick's—suspicions about Gatsby's illegal activities, given the crowd he runs with and his sudden fortune. In other words, Gatsby becomes both more sympathetic and morally problematic in this chapter.  Perhaps Nick "chooses" this time in the story because he began to become aware of Gatsby's complexity at this time, too. It is also possible that Nick problematizes Gatsby here so readers can understand the man better as we continue to read his story. Nick doesn't want us to think Gatsby is a saint, but compared to most of the other characters in the story, he is somehow "great," and this sets him apart.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more