Skip to main content

Provide an argument that supports the idea that Jem could not have killed Bob Ewell, and another argument to support that idea that Jem could have...

Harper Lee does not explicitly state whether or not Jem killed Bob Ewell during the struggle, but Sheriff Tate does suggest that Arthur "Boo" Radley stabbed and killed Bob Ewell with Bob's own knife. One reason to support the idea that Jem could not have killed Bob is the fact that Jem broke his arm during the attack. In Chapter 28, Scout comments,



"We were nearly to the road when I felt Jem’s hand leave me, felt him jerk backwards to the ground. More scuffling, and there came a dull crunching sound and Jem screamed" (Lee 160).



The crunching sound was Jem's arm breaking. It is hard to imagine that Jem, with a broken arm, was able to retrieve Bob's knife and stab him. Also, Scout mentions that someone was carrying Jem from the scene of the attack which indicates that Jem was incapacitated. When Scout arrives home, she thinks that Jem is dead because he is lying in his bed unconscious. The severity of Jem's injuries and his inability to function indicate that he was not capable of stabbing and killing Bob Ewell.


Another argument could be made that Jem did in fact stab and kill Bob Ewell. At the beginning of the attack, Scout says,



"From somewhere near by came scuffling, kicking sounds, sounds of shoes and flesh scraping dirt and roots. Someone rolled against me and I felt Jem. He was up like lightning and pulling me with him but, though my head and shoulders were free, I was so entangled we didn’t get very far" (Lee 160).



Jem could have possibly deflected Bob's knife and inadvertently stabbed Bob as he was escaping. The fact that Scout mentions that Jem was "up like lighting" indicates that Jem initially defended Bob's attack. Immediately after Jem escapes, Scout feels Jem being thrown to the ground and hears his arm break. Scout also mentions that Bob smelled like stale whiskey which reveals that Bob was drunk during his attack. It is not difficult to image that Jem was able to avoid Bob's knife, strip Bob of his weapon, and stab Bob during the struggle. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...