Skip to main content

What does the story mean in your own words?

"Harrison Bergeron" depicts a dystopian future in which "equality" is misunderstood and enforced in an oppressive way.


In American history, the idea of equality that great American thinkers and philosophers have supported is that every American should have the same opportunities to succeed: "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." If the government decides to limit any of those "unalienable rights" (as it says in the "Declaration of Independence"), then the people's freedoms have been taken away. The correct way to ensure equality without interfering with freedom is to encourage success and put infrastructure in place to help and motivate those who are born into situations which limit their opportunities.


In this story, the government has not done this. Their idea is to enforce equality by handicapping talented people and preventing those with less talent from bettering themselves. It is also a society obsessed and placated by mindless television shows. Note, that when Harrison tries to take over, he goes to a television station rather than a government building or executive committee. In this story, the government's strategy is "equality by limitation." In the ideal American society, it would/should be "equality by opportunity."

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more