Skip to main content

In "By the Waters of Babylon," do you believe John is being disrespectful by ignoring his father’s advice and the law?

This is, of course, a matter of opinion. My own view is that John is not disrespectful in “By the Waters of Babylon” because he does not truly defy his father’s advice or the law. His father repeats the law to him, but clearly accepts the idea that John is going to break the law. While John does break the letter of the law, he seems to accept the spirit of the law, and he breaks it because he feels that it is, in a sense, his duty to do so.


Early in the story, John does seem to disobey his father’s advice. He goes to his father and asks his blessing for the journey that he (John) is about to undertake. His father tells him



It is forbidden to travel east. It is forbidden to cross the river. It is forbidden to go to the Place of the Gods. All these things are forbidden.



John acknowledges what his father says and agrees with him, but he says that it was only his father's voice that spoke, not his spirit. In other words, he did not really mean it when he agreed with his father. It seems clear from the story that John’s father understood this and accepted it. He tells John,



Once I had young dreams. If your dreams do not eat you up, you may be a great priest. If they eat you, you are still my son. Now go on your journey.



From this, it seems clear that John’s father tacitly accepts what John is going to do. If his father accepts what he is going to do, John is not really defying his father’s advice.


Similarly, John is not really disobeying the law. He constantly looks for omens that tell him whether the gods accept what he is doing. When he sees these omens, he continues. Before he crosses the river, he worries about whether he is doing the right thing. He cries as he makes his raft, knowing the law forbids what he is about to do. In other words, he clearly respects the law, but he feels the gods are, in a sense, telling him he has to go. He believes he cannot be a good priest if he does not break the law. He says



If I went to the Place of the Gods, I would surely die, but, if I did not go, I could never be at peace with my spirit again. It is better to lose one's life than one's spirit, if one is a priest and the son of a priest.



In other words, John feels the gods have told his spirit that he has to go to the Place of the Gods. He is technically breaking the law, but he is doing so because he feels it is his duty as a priest. Therefore, in my view, he is not really defying the law.


In these ways, I do not think John is being disrespectful. He really cares about his father’s advice and the laws. He feels that he is called to disobey them, though. He does disobey but, in my view, he does so respectfully.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...