Skip to main content

What were Greek temples used for?

In Ancient Greece, temples were built as "houses" for deities that also served as a place of worship. People would worship at a temple by bringing offerings that a particular god was believed to have favored- for example, leaving wine at the temple of Dionysus. Some people may have also cleaned and decorated the temple in service to the gods, or sang and danced outside in honor of the god. Most people did not go inside of the temples, at least not into the innermost chamber, because this was considered a sacred and private place. Instead, people would make their offerings from the outside or an outermost portion of the temple. In the Greek style, these temples varied from large structures like the Parthenon, to smaller community temples or even household shrines. 


It is a little difficult for us modern-day people to understand how the Ancient Greeks related to and thought of their gods. It is possible that some people believed the literal, anthropomorphic embodiment of their gods to live inside of these temples. Most scholars feel it is more likely that people  understood that their temples were dedicated to the idea of the god and everything they ruled. Many Ancient Greek gods could turn into animals or natural forces in the world, so a temple served sort of like a post-office box. People could make prayers and leave offerings at the temple and trust that they were received by the god, even if that deity didn't actually live there. 


Many of these temples and their patron deities also offered a sense of communal identity. One city might be considered protected by a particular deity, and within that, people might choose to worship their communal or household deities as well. Which gods a person chose to interact with reflected their values in life.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.