Skip to main content

What are the Freedom Summer, the Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party, SNCC, and the Voting Rights Act; does this act still exist? ...

The Freedom Summer, also referred to as the Mississippi Freedom Project, took place in the summer of 1964, when civil rights groups such as the Congress of Racial Equality (CORE) and SNCC (Student Non-violent Coordinating Committee) tried to register African-Americans, who were largely disenfranchised, to vote in the state. The civil rights workers were harassed by groups such as the KKK, and two civil rights workers from New York--Michael Schwerner and Andrew Goodman--and one local activist--James Chaney--were murdered in June of 1964 in Philadelphia, Mississippi. SNCC, an offshoot of Dr. Martin Luther King's Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC), involved students across the country, African-American and white, in advocating for civil rights through sit-ins, protests, voter registration drivers, and other forms of activism.


The Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party (MFDP) was a political party organized to represent Mississippi in 1964 as an alternative to the Mississippi Democratic Party, which was all white. The MFDP, which included African-American activists, went to the 1964 Democratic National Convention and sought to be seated at the convention. The party, represented by Fannie Lou Hamer and others, were offered two at-large seats on the convention floor, but they left the convention rather than submit to not receiving regular seats on the floor. 


The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was passed under President Lyndon B. Johnson. It was intended to prevent discrimination in voting and to enforce the right of African-Americans and other racial or ethnic minorities to vote under the 14th and 15th Amendments to the Constitution. Though the law is still in effect, the Supreme Court gutted some of it's key provisions in a controversial 2013 ruling. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more