Luckiest Man, by Jonathan Eig, is about the famous baseball player Lou Gehrig, his life, and his struggle with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. ALS is a progressive neurodegenerative disease, meaning that the nerves of the body weaken and break down progressively over time. ALS is not a disease that one "gets" in the same way that one catches a cold or the flu. Rather, the condition is the result of genetic and environmental factors. Some people inherit a genetic mutation which causes the onset of ALS, but the "sporadic" form is much more common. Lou Gehrig was most likely one of the people who developed the sporadic form, but if anyone in his family had passed on the ALS gene to him, it was not diagnosed or reported. In more recent years, it has been suggested that Gehrig may have developed ALS out of an underlying genetic predisposition which was exacerbated by brain trauma associated with his career in baseball.
As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Comments
Post a Comment