Skip to main content

Can we make a comparison between Shakespeare's Julius Caesar and Othello? What are the differences and the similarities?

You absolutely can compare Julius Caesar with Othello. The two plays are both tragedies, so they share many similarities. Both focus on tragic heroes (Brutus in Julius Caesar and Othello in Othello) who meet their end when external forces exploit their weaknesses. Brutus, for instance, allows his sense of honor to blind him to the cruel reality of politics, while Iago uses Othello's tendency to be jealous to destroy him. Thus, at a very basic level, the two plays have similar structures and focus on similarly tragic heroes. 


Although there are similarities between the two plays, there are also many differences. Julius Caesar, for instance, is a sweeping investigation of political scheming, the value of freedom and representational government, personal codes of honor, and the power of mob mentality. It is, in other words, a sprawling and epic look at the nature of government and the perils of trying to correct a corrupt system. Othello, on the other hand, is much more tightly constructed, as it focuses almost completely on Othello's relationship with Desdemona and Iago's efforts to destroy it. The play focuses on domestic themes, such as infidelity and jealousy, and it largely avoids tackling the public world of politics. As such, if both plays are similarly tragic, then they approach their tragic subject matter very differently, as Julius Caesar opts for epic political drama, while Othello examines the much more intimate world of relationships. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.