Skip to main content

What does Mrs. Jones do to win Roger's trust?

In Langston Hughes short story "Thank You M'am" Mrs. Jones develops trust with Roger through her actions not her words. 


Mrs. Jones is familiar with the circumstances in which Roger is growing up in their Harlem neighborhood. Although she drags him to her home after he attempts to steal her pocketbook, she sets him loose with the door wide open. She simply tells him to go wash up and does not ask questions about his family situation. Her door is wide open and it is up to Roger to decide to run out or to stay. Mrs. Jones does not demand anything of the boy, but she does offer him food and companionship. 


Mrs. Jones confides in Roger by telling him a bit about her past mistakes and demonstrating how she turned her life around. Although her surroundings and food offerings are meager, she came by them through honest work. 


Another way she shows Roger her trust is when she walks behind the curtain to make supper, and she leaves her purse sitting in plain sight. Roger moves so that she can see him at all times. She trusts him enough not to hide her purse. She does not mandate he stay with her or admonish him not to touch her things.



But the boy took care to sit on the far side of the room where he thought she could easily see him out of the corner of her eye, if she wanted to. He did not trust the woman not to trust him. And he did not want to be mistrusted now.




By the time they have shared a meal and conversation, Roger wants Mrs. Jones to trust him. He responds to her kindness and willingness to share what little she has. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more