Skip to main content

In Chains, why did the men stop talking when Becky and Isabel entered the room, but then they started talking again as soon as Becky left?

The men do not consider Isabel a person capable of listening and understanding their conversation.  They believe this about Isabel because she is a black slave. 


Isabel has always known that white slave owners think less of her, but in chapter six Curzon flat out tells Isabel that the Locktons do not consider Isabel a human being.  Curzon asks Isabel to spy on the Locktons, but Isabel thinks that she won't hear anything worthwhile.  



"They won't say anything in front of me."  


"You are a small black girl, Country," he said bitterly.  "You are a slave, not a person.  They'll say things in front of you they won't say in front of the white servants.  'Cause you don't count to them.  It happens all the time to me." 


There was truth in his words, hard truth, a hammer striking stone. 



It turns out that Curzon is correct because Isabel overhears many important pieces of information while she is the same room as Lockton and his conspirators.  She overhears the plot to bribe members of the Patriot army, and she overhears the plot to assassinate General George Washington.  The entire assassination plot was discussed while Isabel was in the same room as the men!  They don't consider her a person at all.  They act like she is the house dog or something like that.  Isabel is present, but ultimately doesn't matter. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more