Skip to main content

Can you offer suggestions for a thesis statement for a critical essay on "Archaic Torso of Apollo" by Rainier Maria Rilke? My thesis statement (and...

You are off to a great start with your thesis idea. A formal thesis statement encompassing this idea could be worded as follows:



Through his unambiguous interpretation of the subject matter at hand, Rilke both expresses appreciation for the beauty of the human form and acknowledges the idea that art comes to life through observation.



A thesis on this subject might be organized according to the four stanzas of the poem, each of which expounds on the central idea in the thesis statement. For example, the first stanza suggests that although only the god's torso is presented in the sculpture, it holds a life of its own. This life is described by Rilke as "a lamp, in which his gaze, now turned to low, gleams in all its power." This clever use of simile illustrates the personification of the torso that characterizes this poem. By isolating his subject matter, Rilke proves that facial expressions and literal eyes are not required to experience the "gaze" of the sculpture.


In the second stanza, Rilke notes how the "curved breast" of the sculpture "could not dazzle you so" if the work was not "suffused with brilliance." He also describes a "smile" that runs through the sculpture's hips and thighs, hinting at the theme of virility that is both implied in the work and a part of Apollo's nature. This simile is particularly important as supporting evidence for the thesis statement because it demonstrates Rilke's ability to understand the true nature of the subject matter with the limited visual information presented by the sculpture. 


After gazing at the sculpture for so long, it has taken on a life of its own in the poet's eyes. With none of the typical human indicators of emotion and expression to draw upon, such as the eyes and mouth, the poem implies that the observer is able to see the true spirit of the work. Without facial features, the sculpture smiles and dazzles. Despite being made of stone, it exudes warmth. These lifelike qualities characterize Rilke's perception of the torso and allow the reader to see the subject through an entirely different perspective.


In the third stanza, Rilke notes that "Otherwise this stone would seem defaced" without a head. This line implies that the sculpture itself is imbued with life that gives it more personality and expressiveness than mere stone can produce. In his eyes, the stone glistens "like a wild beast's fur," further solidifying the poet's rugged, almost animalistic interpretation of the piece.


In the final stanza, Rilke comments that the sculpture has "burst like a star" with light "from all the borders of itself." This line draws the conclusion the entire poem has been building towards: the torso has exceeded the bounds of its limited form and taken on a life and nature of its own. Without examining or referencing any outside sources, it is reasonable to speculate that Rilke views the torso as a case study on the nature of form in art. Rilke describes his experience viewing the sculpture as interactive, one in which he begins by assessing the work only to find the assessment turned on him. This is exemplified in the lines, "for here there is no place that does not see you. You must change your life."


By discussing these themes, which present themselves naturally throughout the structure of the poem, you can craft a strong essay without relying on any outside analyses of the work.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more