Skip to main content

How is the story "The Necklace" by Guy de Maupassant ironic?

The irony in "The Necklace" is based on the fact that Madame Loisel and her husband spend ten years of toil and privation paying for a necklace which turns out to be a cheap imitation. The critical point in the story is reached when Madame Forestier tells Madame Loisel:



"Oh, my poor Mathilde! But mine was imitation. It was worth at the very most five hundred francs! . . . "



It is not only Mathilde Loisel who is shocked, but the reader as well. The reader as been led to believe that the borrowed necklace was genuine and that it was worth approximately 36,000 francs.


This type of irony is called situational irony. It involves an incongruity between what is expected and what actually occurs. Irony is usually like a bad joke. It would be funny if it were not so painful. Mathilde paid a fearful price for the few moments of triumph she enjoyed at the Minister's ball. But no reader would feel like laughing at her and her poor husband. The reader feels pity for both. As Maupassant describes her towards the end of the story:



Madame Loisel looked old now. She had become the woman of impoverished households--strong and hard and rough. With frowsy hair, skirts askew and red hands, she talked loud while washing the floor with great swishes of water. But sometimes, when her husband was at the office, she sat down near the window and she thought of that gay evening of long ago, of that ball where she had been so beautiful and so admired.



No doubt in addition to feeling mortified at the realization that she had wasted ten years of her life and sacrificed her beauty for a trifle, Mathilde Loisel must remember the night of the ball and wonder how many of the partners she danced with were aware that her necklace was nothing but an imitation. She is not only mortified about the present when her friend reveals the truth about the imitation necklace, but she must also feel mortified in retrospect at the realization that many of the important men and women must have known she was an imposter, not unlike Cinderella at the ball in the fairy tale.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more