Skip to main content

The climax of “Raymond’s Run” takes place toward the end of the story, as Squeaky and Gretchen wait for the winner of the fifty-yard dash to...

At the end of the race in Toni Cade Bambara’s story “Raymond’s Run,” there is a bit suspense.


Squeaky and Gretchen finish running the race, and Squeaky realizes Raymond ran right along with her on the other side of the fence. The outcome of the race is not known at this time. As the race directors begin to announce the winner, the public address system begins to make a high pitched sound and then dies out. The timers can be heard discussing the results and their voices become muddled in the background. Both Squeaky and Gretchen are recovering by walking off the race and taking deep breathes. The girls are questioning who won the race, which adds to the suspense of the moment.


“In first place . . .” the man on the loudspeaker is clear as a bell now. But then he pauses and the loudspeaker starts to whine. Then static. And I lean down to catch my breath and here comes Gretchen walking back, for she’s overshot the finish line too, huffing and puffing with her hands on her hips taking it slow, breathing in steady time like a real pro and I sort of like her a little for the first time. “In first place . . .” and then three or four voices get all mixed up on the loudspeaker and I dig my sneaker into the grass and stare at Gretchen who’s staring back, we both wondering just who did win.


 While they are waiting, Raymond climbs over the fence to join Squeaky. She reacts to his running abilities with jubilation by hugging him while they jump up and down. She is so proud of him and sees him in a different light. Those who watched the race think her reaction is because the men on the loud speaker finally announce her as the winner.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.