Skip to main content

In the face of the hurricane, how does Tea Cake's belief system reveal itself to mirror that of Joe Stark's in Their Eyes Were Watching God?

Both Joe Starks and Tea Cake are strong, dominant men who are leaders in their communities. Since they are leaders, they like to make their own decisions without anyone's help--least of all Janie's. They like to be obeyed and respected for who they are and don't like to admit they need help or are defeated in any way. They also don't make any major decisions with Janie or anyone else. Major decisions are not made by either man unless he is forced into making one. For example, when the hurricane is about to hit, 'Lias offers Tea Cake and Janie a ride in his car to get away from it in chapter 18; but, Tea Cake decides to stay because he believes that he will miss out on making money the next day when work begins again. He also watches the white people in the big house, and since they haven't decided to leave when 'Lias invites Tea Cake to leave, he won't go. It isn't until Tea Cake sees dead things floating in waist-high water around his house that he decides to leave the Muck. 


Another example of stubbornness that both husbands share is that they refuse doctors when they are sick and need one and they won't admit that they need real help, either. Joe goes to a root doctor rather than a real medical doctor when he becomes overweight and sick. As a result, Joe dies from kidney disease, which could have been treated if he had received the proper treatment at the right time. As with Starks, Tea Cake refuses to see a doctor after being bitten by a rabid dog during the hurricane because he'd rather find a place to rest instead. Both men suffer death because of such stubbornness and pride.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more