Skip to main content

Describe the power held by the federal government after the Civil War.

The power of the federal government grew as a result of the Civil War. One of the causes of the Civil War was a difference of opinion over whether the federal government or the state governments should have more power. The North believed the federal government should have more power.


Once the Civil War ended, the southern states were still not a part of the Union. The federal government was in charge of Reconstruction. Congress created the Freedmen’s Bureau to help African-Americans adjust to freedom. It also passed the Civil Rights Act of 1866 that gave African-Americans full citizenship. New amendments to the Constitution were passed that ended slavery, determined who would be a citizen of the United States, and guaranteed voting rights for people regardless if they were slaves in the past or what their race or color was. The southern states were told they had to approve the 13th and 14th amendments before they would be readmitted to the Union. The Reconstruction Act of 1867 set the terms and the conditions of Reconstruction. These state governments had no say in the development of these Reconstruction policies.


The Civil War strengthened the power of the federal government. It made it clear that the federal government had more power than the state governments had.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.