Skip to main content

Who is the main character, Sonny or the narrator? How would this story be different if it were told by Sonny?

The main character of "Sonny's Blues" is the narrator, who tries to come to terms with what has happened to his brother. At the outset of the story, after he hears that his brother has been arrested for selling heroin, the narrator says, "I couldn't believe it: but what I mean by that is that I couldn't find any room for it anywhere inside me." The story revolves around the narrator's attempt to make sense of what has happened to his brother by going back into their past and then watching his brother play music, an experience that helps the narrator understand who his brother is and what he values.


If Sonny had told the story, it would have been very different. Instead of Sonny's brother trying to figure out Sonny, Sonny could have told his own tale of what happened. Sonny would've explained what drove him to do drugs and how the narrator, his brother, and his family had not understood him. He would have perhaps included other reasons why he turned to drugs. "Sonny's Blues" involves one character trying to unravel the psychological mysteries of another character; if Sonny had told the story, it would have involved less psychological mystery and would have been a more straightforward narrative. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.