Slavery was downright essential to mercantilism in eighteenth-century Great Britain. This was because mercantilism depended on the use of colonies to produce raw materials, particularly cash crops, for the mother country. These cash crops, with sugar being by far the most important, represented a major source of revenue for Great Britain. Other important cash crops included tobacco, rice, and indigo. These crops were imported by British merchants, and, theoretically at least, had to be carried on British ships. Slaves were absolutely essential to the production of these crops, which formed the foundation of the colonial British economy. Enslaved people labored on the sugar plantations of Barbados, the rice fields of Carolina, and the tobacco plantations of the Chesapeake producing the goods upon which the colonial economy depended. Even the slave trade itself was crucial to mercantilism, as the state, through the granting of monopolies, became not only the biggest consumer of cash crops and seller of manufactured goods, but the biggest supplier of labor as well.
As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Comments
Post a Comment