Skip to main content

What was the agrarian economy like in the South and what locations produced a lot of cotton?

The agrarian economy in the South was largely composed of subsistence farmers who may or may not own their own plots. They used hired help, their own children, or maybe even rented a slave to get through the busy periods of planting and harvest. The larger planters produced one cash crop, mainly tobacco, rice, or cotton, with cotton overtaking the others when Eli Whitney invented the cotton gin in 1793. Large plantations were often located near rivers in order to get crops to market faster. While the large planters made up a tiny minority of Southern society, their political control was quite strong, and they were wealthy in terms of land ownership.


The Lower South—Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina, and Louisiana—produced much of the nation's cotton, as cotton required fertile land and a long growing season. After the Mexican-American War, planters flocked to East Texas to take advantage of its flat, fertile ground and adequate rainfall. These areas also produced much of the Confederacy's political and military leadership.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.