Skip to main content

What are two differences between the native peoples of North and South America?

I can think of two major differences between the cultures of North and South American indigenous populations. First, North American indigenous populations were far more mobile than those in South America. As far as we are able to discern from archaeology and historical studies, First Nations peoples of North America practiced a hunter-gatherer subsistence lifestyle. They might spend one season in one region, hunting deer or catching fish, and travel during another season for the purpose of gathering wild foods like berries. Some First Nations tribes did practice small-scale subsistence agriculture, but nothing like that of South American tribes. In South America, life was far more centralized to city-kingdoms. In fact, several prosperous and highly stratified societies developed in South America. For example, the Inca empire had a range of very wealthy elites to (relatively) poor laborers. Wealth became concentrated in the capital city of Cuzco, as people were required to send goods to this administrative center as tax payments. Not only were luxury goods from the reaches of the empire sent to the capital; food produced in the agricultural parts of the empire was redistributed through the capital as a sort of security system in case of crop failure. This was a far more stratified and administrated society as compared to the relatively egalitarian, nomadic lifestyle of North American peoples.


Another major difference, which manifested itself in societal structure, were beliefs about the relationship between the sacred and the profane. Most North American indigenous cultures held that there was no difference between the world we live in and the spiritual realm. The god(s) were in all things, all people, and all places, and it is our duty as humans to co-exist with all of nature as a part of the same spiritual entity. By this same belief, god(s) or the sacred did not really become concentrated in or limited to just one individual. Anyone could "channel" god(s), and it was not off-limits to anyone in particular. However, in most South American indigenous cultures, things were quite different. The leaders of the great empires and city-kingdoms I mentioned before were often considered god-kings. This means they might have been considered an earthly manifestation of god(s,) or they were believed to be the best and most direct advocate for the people in dealing with god(s). Sometimes rulers were believed to have been descended from god(s) themselves. It is in part because of this belief that so much wealth was concentrated centrally in South American indigenous cultures-- sending as much wealth as possible to the person who negotiates with god(s) is sure to get you on their good side! 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

etymology - Origin of the greeting "Sweet dreams".

Does anybody know the etymology of the phrase "sweet dreams"? I tried googling but did not find anything satisfying. Is this a relatively new phrase of the modern world or has this been in use for some time? I think it's the latter one. Answer The OED has the interjection as "a farewell to someone going to bed" from the 20th century: 1908 Sears Roebuck Catal. 198/1 Tenor Solos..Good Bye, Sweet Dreams, Good Bye. But it goes back until at least the 19th and possibly 18th centuries. John Wolcot, writing under the pseudonym of Peter Pindar, used it in his poem "Orson and Ellen; A Legendary Tale" published in 1801: Also from 1801 in The infernal Quixote (Page 287) by Charles Lucas: In the March 1776 of The Universal Magazine was published "The Serenade. A Pastoral Tale. From the German of Gesner" , where the shepherd Daphnis watches over his beloved as she sleeps and sings: The same tale appears in 1776's as Idyl XI, " Daphnis ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

What are the similarities between the relationships of the characters in The Outsiders and Romeo and Juliet?

At first glance, it might appear as if the characters in  The Outsiders  by S. E. Hinton and  Romeo and Juliet  by William Shakespeare do not have much in common; however, when one isolates the core of the conflicts, it becomes clear that the relationships in both stories are rooted in rivalry and secrecy.  In both  The Outsiders  and  Romeo and Juliet , an overarching theme is rivalry. While   socioeconomic status separates the greasers from the Socs in The Outsiders , last names separates the Montagues from the Capulets, who appear to be relatively equal in terms of socioeconomic status. Due to these rivalries, there are instances of deadly interactions in both stories. In  The Outsiders , Johnny kills Bob (whether his actions were justified or not is debatable). In  Romeo and Juliet , Romeo kills Tybalt and Paris, and Tybalt kills Mercutio. These deaths have profound effects on the main characters. In Ponyboy's case, the Johnny's death and other events in the novel inspire h...
Post a Comment
Read more