Skip to main content

How did Niccolo Machiavelli connect the anarchy in international politics with his book The Prince?

Machiavelli approached his political treatise The Prince as a primer for rulers of various types of political entities extant in Italy during his time, the early 16th-century. He uses the term "states" to describe these political entities, which ranged from hereditary kingdoms to Republics and city-states found among the political amalgam of Italy at that time (which wouldn't become a unified nation until the late 19th century).


Machiavelli's overarching theme in The Prince is the notion that rulers, even those elected by democratic means (though those means were often restricted to election by a limited number of citizens at that time, mainly the powerful), could not rule in the abstract, i.e., they could not effectively rule via idealistic notions that involved broad participation in decisions by those who were ruled. Machiavelli inveighed against the notion that rulers should be transparent and entirely honest to those who were ruled, and in fact often must adopt subterfuge and blunt political stratagems that might go against the popular will, for the benefit of not only the state he ruled, but for the subjects of citizens of that state. A famous quote from the work is the following:



"He who neglects what is done for what ought to be done, sooner effects his ruin than his preservation."



Machiavelli observed a world that, as in many parts of Europe such as Germany, possessed myriad political, religious, class and racial tensions, tensions that often threatened to boil over and result in great upheaval. His contention in The Prince was that political rule required a strong hand to control these tensions and keep competing factions in check, and that the means of controlling political turmoil was justified by the ends, i.e., a modicum of political tranquility.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more