Skip to main content

What are the differences between physical and chemical changes?

After a substance undergoes a physical change, the resulting product is still the same substance you started with. For instance, if you tear a piece of paper into hundreds of smaller pieces, you have only changed it physically. It is still the same paper—only the size of the pieces have changed. When water is found as ice (solid), liquid water (liquid) or water vapor (gas), it is still the substance water. These changes are merely physical changes which have changed the state the matter is in, but the water is not changed in any way chemically because it is still has the formula H2O. Mixtures are another example of a physical change, like saltwater. By boiling it, the salt remains in the pot but the water evaporates and can be recaptured as pure water.


A chemical change involves a chemical reaction. Here, one set of chemicals undergo a reaction to form a different set of chemicals which are known as the products. Sometimes, a chemical reaction may require an input of energy known as activation energy and other chemical reactions may occur spontaneously.


An example of a chemical change is when sodium atoms combine with chlorine atoms to form table salt (sodium chloride). The properties of the reactants—sodium and chlorine—are much different than the properties of the product, table salt. Many times, chemical reactions need enzymes to function as catalysts, which help speed along a chemical reaction.


Another example of a chemical change is when the reactant hydrogen peroxide is converted into the products water and oxygen gas. This would normally occur at a very slow pace until the enzyme catalase is added. One can see hydrogen peroxide decompose to water and oxygen because oxygen bubbles are released during this chemical change. The properties of hydrogen peroxide—the reactant—are chemically different from the products, water and oxygen gas. This is another example of a chemical change.


I have included a link to show how to perform the hydrogen peroxide decomposition experiment.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...