Skip to main content

In Whitman’s poem “Song of Myself,” in what ways does “I celebrate myself…” serve as an appropriate introduction to the themes and...

"I celebrate myself" is the first portion of the first line of Walt Whitman's most famous poem, "Song of Myself." It is a fitting introduction, as Whitman's sprawling verse is most seriously concerned with developing a radical conception of the individual. In 52 sections, Whitman explores various themes, ideas, and images, but he returns again and again to the self in what becomes a celebration of the individual and the interconnected structure of the universe.


"I celebrate myself" is a fitting introduction to this project, as it introduces Whitman's most important theme: the sovereignty of the self and the exploration of individual identity. This introductory line, along with the first section it precedes, touches on this basic theme at multiple points, as Whitman calls out to his "soul" (4), considers aspects of his physical body (6), and prepares to speak, "Hoping to cease not till death" (9). In short, "I celebrate myself" immediately orients the reader to the foundation of "Song of Myself": Whitman's extensive, even epic, exploration of the nature of identity. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.