Skip to main content

How is Deborah Hall described in Same Kind of Different as Me?

This inspiring true story is told by the two men who lived it—Ron Hall and Denver Moore. Ron, a Dallas art dealer, and Denver, a homeless man who grew up picking cotton in virtual slavery in Louisiana, become unlikely friends because of Ron’s wife Deborah.


Ron describes his wife in her younger days as “a bookworm and as neat as a preacher’s wife on Sunday.” Deborah’s character is evident in her reaction to finding out her husband had had an long-time affair. Speaking to the other woman on the phone, Deborah takes ownership of her part in the breakdown of her relationship, forgives the woman, and then tells her husband “You and I are now going to rewrite the future history of our marriage.” She promises to forgive her husband and never bring up the affair again. She proves to be calm in the face of adversity, forgiving in the face of betrayal.


Deborah’s kind spirit shines when she convinces her husband to volunteer with her at the homeless shelter where they meet Denver. Denver describes her positive influence, saying, “Her goal was changed lives, healed hearts.”


Deborah, who dedicated herself to helping others, ends up needing help herself when she is diagnosed with terminal cancer. Even in the face of death, she again grants her husband forgiveness for his infidelity and even gives her blessing if Ron should want to go back to the other woman after her death.


Through this book and her memory, Deborah Hall still inspires others to serve those in need. For more information on this story, see the video link below. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...