Skip to main content

Two cyclists approach each other from opposite directions on a bike path. Amy is cycling east at 5.7 m/s, while Colin is cycling west at 6.4 m/s....

As we know, any mechanical movement of a physical body occurs only relative to some other body. The most common reference body on Earth's surface is Earth itself. We consider it "at rest," although this is relative, too.


So, "Amy is cycling East at `5.7` m/s, while Colin is cycling West at `6.4` m/s" means that they have these speeds and directions relative to Earth. "Carolyn is standing" means she is at rest relative to Earth.


All three persons move with constant velocities (speeds and directions) relative to each other. Relative to Amy, Colin's direction is towards her, the west direction, and the speed is the sum of their speeds relative to Earth, i.e. `5.7+6.4=12.1` (m/s). This is the answer for a).


Relative to Colin, Carolyn's speed is the same `6.4` m/s, and the direction is towards Colin, to the east. This is the answer for b).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.