Skip to main content

What is the historical background of the poem "A Doctor's Journal Entry for August 6, 1945" by Vikram Seth?

August 6, 1945, is the day that the first American atomic bomb was dropped over Hiroshima.


This bomb, nicknamed "Little Boy," was dropped upon Hiroshima. Later, the United States dropped a bomb over Nagasaki because the government of Japan refused to surrender unconditionally.


Vikram Seth's poem, "A Doctor's Journal Entry for August 6, 1945," which describes the horrors witnessed and endured by physicians when the atomic bomb falls, is ironically unassuming in tone. Even the simplicity of style belies the horrific moments witnessed and experienced by the doctor.


The poem begins much like the Japanese haiku:



The morning stretched calm, beautiful and warm.
Sprawling half clad, I gazed out at the form
Of shimmering leaves and shadows.



Without warning, the doctor suddenly feels his skin burning and sees his blood; immediately, he frantically searches for his wife, only to find her also blood-soaked. They rush out and run down the street, but trip over a dead body that has been blown apart:



We fell tripped, by something at our feet,
I gasped out, when I saw it was a head;
Excuse me, please excuse me – He was dead.



Horrified, they push on toward the hospital until the doctor can go no farther, and he must sit down. He instructs his wife to continue to the hospital. When he regains some strength, he again walks and finds others, all stoically holding their arms out to avoid the pain of the raw flesh touching another body part. Yet,



Silence was common to us all. I heard
No cries of anguish, or a single word.



Despite this horrific event and the pain endured, the Japanese rebuilt Hiroshima and Nagasaki. While "A Doctor's Journal Entry for August 6, 1945" depicts the horrors of the bombing, it also implies what one critic calls "the moral nakedness" of those who could order and carry out this bombing.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.