Skip to main content

In The Story of My Life, how did the introduction of the word "water" awaken Helen Keller's soul?

Miss Sullivan came to the Keller home to be six-year-old Helen Keller's teacher.  Helen had suffered from a severe illness shortly before her second birthday.  The illness left her deaf and blind.  Miss Sullivan's primary goal when she arrived was to teach Helen how to communicate.  She did so by attempting to teach Helen the manual alphabet.  


The manual alphabet is a form of communication.  Signed letters are pressed into a person's palm.  The person feels the form of the letters in their palm and recognizes the words being spelled.


Repeatedly, Miss Sullivan spelled words into Helen's palm while presenting the child with the object being described.  For example, she handed Helen a doll and spelled the word into her hand.  Helen thought it was a game and did not understand.  She did not yet grasp that everything around her had a name.


One day, Miss Sullivan took Helen out for a walk.  They came upon a water spout, and the teacher held the little girl's hand under the flow.  The water fell on Helen's hand, and Miss Sullivan spelled the letters "w-a-t-e-r" into her opposite hand.  Helen suddenly made the connection between the two.  At last, she understood that the letters "w-a-t-e-r" meant the liquid emerging from the spout.


In her autobiography, The Story of My Life, Helen described this moment of recognition:  "Somehow the mystery of language was revealed to me" (Chapter IV).  "Water" was the first word that Helen understood.  This single word was the beginning of a lifelong journey of learning and communication for Helen.  In her book, she wrote about the freedom that "water" gave her:



That living word awakened my soul, gave it light, hope, joy, set it free!


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more