Skip to main content

In The Story of My Life, how did the introduction of the word "water" awaken Helen Keller's soul?

Miss Sullivan came to the Keller home to be six-year-old Helen Keller's teacher.  Helen had suffered from a severe illness shortly before her second birthday.  The illness left her deaf and blind.  Miss Sullivan's primary goal when she arrived was to teach Helen how to communicate.  She did so by attempting to teach Helen the manual alphabet.  


The manual alphabet is a form of communication.  Signed letters are pressed into a person's palm.  The person feels the form of the letters in their palm and recognizes the words being spelled.


Repeatedly, Miss Sullivan spelled words into Helen's palm while presenting the child with the object being described.  For example, she handed Helen a doll and spelled the word into her hand.  Helen thought it was a game and did not understand.  She did not yet grasp that everything around her had a name.


One day, Miss Sullivan took Helen out for a walk.  They came upon a water spout, and the teacher held the little girl's hand under the flow.  The water fell on Helen's hand, and Miss Sullivan spelled the letters "w-a-t-e-r" into her opposite hand.  Helen suddenly made the connection between the two.  At last, she understood that the letters "w-a-t-e-r" meant the liquid emerging from the spout.


In her autobiography, The Story of My Life, Helen described this moment of recognition:  "Somehow the mystery of language was revealed to me" (Chapter IV).  "Water" was the first word that Helen understood.  This single word was the beginning of a lifelong journey of learning and communication for Helen.  In her book, she wrote about the freedom that "water" gave her:



That living word awakened my soul, gave it light, hope, joy, set it free!


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more